New ‘Mattress Girl’ Lawsuit -- Obscene Drawing of Cleared Man ‘Displayed on Campus’

From HeatStreet via H/T at Instapundit:

EXCLUSIVE: See the obscene “revenge porn” of Nungesser by “mattress girl”, showing him naked and aroused, displayed in Columbia’s campus art gallery for two weeks

Columbia professor Jon Kessler—a defendant in new suit —’referred to the mattress as “the site of [her] rape,” implying fellow student Nungesser was guilty’

I think she suffers from Borderline Personality Disorder otherwise known as '3rd Wave Feminism!'

While the truth remains elusive, Nungesser’s lawsuit marshals an impressive array of facts contradicting Sulkowicz’s account, including the lack of any evidence that she seemed traumatized or had visible injuries after being—according to her—anally raped, hit in the face and violently choked. It also contains the new allegation that Sulkowicz tried to persuade an unnamed female Columbia student to bring charges against Nungesser in order to “support her as a woman.”

Unlike other accused men who have sued colleges in recent years, Nungesser was not expelled but ultimately cleared of all charges including Sulkowicz’s. The ex-girlfriend’s complaint was dismissed; Nungesser was initially found “responsible” on the third charge but exonerated on appeal, an extraordinary outcome in the complainant-friendly system of campus “justice.” Yet another complaint, brought during Nungesser’s senior year by a male student who claimed Nungesser had sexually groped him during a conversation three years earlier, was also closed without a hearing as lacking in credibility. Columbia’s internal report on the investigation, a photocopy of which I was able to obtain from a confidential source, went so far as to hint that this accusation could be the product of a collective vendetta. (Nungesser’s lawsuit explicitly claims it was instigated by Sulkowicz.)

More like vindictive bitch!

But while Nungesser was able to graduate, the lawsuit persuasively argues that Sulkowicz’s activism and the surrounding publicity caused him serious harm—abetted by Columbia officials who refused to recognize him as an innocent man and treated his exoneration as an embarrassing inconvenience.

Think of the damages, an Ivy League educated man who can't get a job.

Female student pens scathing review of 'rape culture' for college course

From Ashe Schow at The Washington Examiner:

A pre-med student attending college in California has penned a scathing review of the current climate surrounding sexual assault on college campuses.

The student, who wishes to remain anonymous, wrote her essay in response to a public-health class assignment asking students to watch a video in which Emma Sulkowicz, the former Columbia University student who carried a mattress around protesting what she claimed was rape, discusses her mattress project. .................

The student responded by condemning Sulkowicz's behavior as "a parody of all the worst parts of radical or 'Tumblr' feminists" and said she was "ashamed to even belong to the same species as her." The student was outraged by Sulkowicz's accusation, especially after having followed the accused student's side closely.

"Not only was Emma's false accusation abhorrent and did she inflict physical and emotional trauma on Paul [the man Sulkowicz accused], but her response to the widespread media attention is the most immature and attention-seeking action she could've possibly taken," the student wrote.

The student's evidence for Sulkowicz's attention-seeking behavior was the fact that she claimed to be deeply traumatized and triggered by things that remind her of the incident, but spent every day reminding herself of what allegedly happened. "Furthermore," the student wrote, "why would she produce a porno of her 'rape' that would've forced her to relive all of those emotions once again?"

The student insisted there was "an extremely valid and rational explanation" for why neither Columbia University nor the police department held the accused student accountable: Because he didn't rape her. The student also called Sulkowicz's continued campaign "a form of self-victimization."

This female pre-med student has single handily destroyed, through simple logic, any credibility Sulkowicz and other radical feminist, who support her, that Sulkowicz is anything other than a narcissistic publicity whore.

The Hunt for a Good Bad Guy

From Taki's Magazine via H/T from Instapundit:

There is a severe rape drought going on in the West; not the violent sexual assault as is broadly defined by the law but a particular kind of rape. We want wealthy white males with blond hair high-fiving each other as they torture some poor girl who was just trying to get an education. The Middle East is resplendent with these scenarios, but the guy usually has a funny hat on instead of Richie Rich hair.
..........................


There is a lot of currency behind the Duke lacrosse rapist ideal. Through Title IX, the government offers financial rewards to schools for digging up sexual offenders in varsity jackets. Rapists give feminists something to fight for in a culture where women have little to complain about. This means when a woman lies about frat boys, or carries a mattress around, or simply says someone resembles a rapist, the ax falls hard.
..........................

Which brings me to this week’s rape de semaine. Daryush Valizadeh is a “pickup artist” (a.k.a. PUA) who spares us his ridiculous foreign name by using the moniker Roosh V. He tours the world giving small groups of men simple tips such as: Get in shape, be interesting, start the conversation simple, etc. As far as I’m concerned he’s a hippie love guru trying to rebuild the male-female relationship after decades of sabotage. We live in a stifled environment where groups of men have entirely given up on women and replaced them with porn. They call it a “sexodus” and groups such as MGTOW (Men Going Their Own Way) are “Refusing to bow, serve and kneel for the opportunity to be treated like a disposable utility.” This isn’t good for the human race. As Joe Strummer used to say, “Without people, you’re nothing.”

Encouraging traditional gender roles is a dangerous trend for the rape alarmists. So when Roosh announced he was doing talks in Toronto and Montreal this week, the feminazis committed to shut it down. They cited an article he wrote back in February called “How to Stop Rape” wherein he said we should “make rape legal if done on private property.” His point being women would be a lot less heedless about inviting men over and false accusations would also end if this amendment came to pass. His proposal was about as serious as one of Jonathan Swift’s, but the message is correct. Women have such hubris these days that they are endangering themselves. Getting wasted in public is reckless for a woman no matter how much we “teach men not to rape.” Passing out on a crowded beach may not be asking for it, but it’s pretty close. This is what an intellectual discussion does. It posits an outlandish hypothesis that provokes you into confronting a dark truth. He could have said, “If we forbade black men from ever being around white women, rape cases would plummet.” This is an impossible scenario no sane person would want to implement, but it’s also a great way to showcase the shocking statistics behind interracial rape.

The last thing feminism can tolerate is men REFUSING to bow down.

Cheers to Roosh giving them the flutters and read the whole thing.

Another sad reason to be skeptical of brutal campus sexual assault allegations

From the Ashe Schow at the Washington Examiner:

One of the more damaging and lasting effects of the Rolling Stone gang-rape debacle was that allegations of brutal campus sexual assaults would be less likely to be believed.

The accuser in that story, Jackie, painted a picture of an assault so brutal as to challenge the imagination. She claimed she had been gang-raped on broken glass and punched in the face, and that the experience left her covered in blood and bruises and cuts.

Given her own description, it was difficult to believe that anyone who saw her in such a state would have suggested she not report such a hideous and obvious crime.

A perfect example woman trying to get the attention of another male by claiming to be raped. She's trying to get the target of her affections to be her White Knight.

The same issues plagued Emma Sulkowicz at Columbia University, who claimed that during an otherwise consensual sexual encounter, a man who had never before shown violent tendencies suddenly punched her, choked her and raped her as she fought back. The accused student, Paul Nungesser, invited Sulkowicz to a party two days after this alleged attack — hinting that if the allegations are true, he must be a real sociopath.

I don't know what to make of this woman. My first reaction after learning the fact, she was driven by jealousy for be scorned, since the man she accused was interested in another woman.

My second reaction, after learning about her family and background, she's never been left wanting for anything, i.e. spoiled brat.

Third reaction, attention whore. She liked all the hubbub created by carrying the mattress around.

But then the video. Her "recreation of the "rape." At first, it's just more of being an attention whore. Throw in that her own mother was hyping the video on Youtube, leads me to my final conclusion.

In layman's terms, she's crazy. Just plain crazy.

In both cases, allegedly brutal attacks that would have left obvious injuries were not reported until months later and no witnesses ever confirmed the injuries. Sulkowicz didn't provide a witness at her hearing that confirmed they saw her with bruises around her neck or any facial injury.

Worse still, the accusations suggest that the men involved — fellow university students — fail to grasp the seriousness of punching, choking or otherwise violently injuring a woman in the course of sex as she screams and fights back. How else could they, days later, resume their friendships with those women as if nothing brutal had ever taken place.

Both cases fail the logic test, since they are both fabrications.

The case of Rachel Dolezal - strange but not surprising

From Paul Mirengoff at Powerline Blog:

President Obama should weigh in. He is, after all, our explainer-in-chief when it comes to race. I’d also like to hear from Eric Holder. Or is he part of the “nation of cowards” when it comes to discussing race?
........................

Anyone who has observed what certain parents and their kids will claim to enhance their prospects for admission to the college of their choice won’t be surprised by Dolezal’s false claims about her race. Anyone who observed the rise of “wiggers” in the 1990s, when it is said that 70 to 75 percent of purchases of rap music were by whites, won’t be surprised that Dolezal strongly identified with blacks.

Take the opportunity to combine advantage with chic, throw in a disturbed, guilt-ridden personality, and you can understand Dolezal’s case.

This mental illness must be the same one that afflicts Emma "Mattress Girl" Sulkowicz.

The NAACP appears to be standing behind Dolezal. It’s not shocking, and not to be despised, that the organization will accept a white chapter president. What’s disappointing is that it will accept a liar. (Editor's Emphasis) I guess race hustling has become an acceptable form of lying.

Well, Harvard hasn't fire Elizabeth "Fauxcohontas" Warren yet, and the people of Massachusetts did elect her and Obama to office. So being aliar is not a big deal to liberals, IF you're a liberal.

Tweet of the Month

From Robert Stacy McCain:

Bruce Jenner is a woman, Emma Sulkowicz is a rape victim, #RachelDolezal is black, and I am a reuben sandwich with a side order of fries.

— Robert Stacy McCain (@rsmccain) June 12, 2015