UVA Dean Defamed In Rolling Stone Article Takes On Major Feminist Organization

From The Daily Caller:

The University of Virginia dean who is suing Rolling Stone for defamation has asked a federal judge to force the National Organization for Women (NOW) to turn over its correspondence with lawyers for the woman whose false rape claims are the centerpiece of the debunked article, “A Rape on Campus.”

Attorneys for the dean, Nicole Eramo, allege that NOW, the largest feminist group in the U.S., and the lawyers for the false rape accuser, Jackie Coakley (“Jackie”), engaged in a “publicity stunt” by jointly crafting a Jan. 6, 2016 open letter criticizing Eramo for “re-victimiz[ing]” the fabulist.

Defendants in the $7.5 million lawsuit — which include Rolling Stone and its reporter, Sabrina Rubin Erdely — have indicated that they plan to introduce the letter as evidence in the case.

But the letter is a case of self-dealing, suggests Eramo’s lawyer, Thomas Clare. And he is asking the federal court to force NOW to comply with a subpoena for its communications with Jackie’s attorneys at the firm Stein Mitchell.

Question? How does one "re-victimize" someone who was NOT a victim of a crime?

Eramo has faced numerous roadblocks in her attempt to compel discovery from Jackie, who has gone into hiding.

The former UVA student has refused to produce emails and text messages that she exchanged during the time period of her fabricated rape claims and with Erdely.

The Judge should order Coakley to provide the email or be jailed for contempt of court.

"Jackie's" Lawyers Implicitly Admit "Jackie" Made Up "Haven Monahan" Just Like She Made Up Her "Terminal Illness"

From Ace of Spades HQ:

I'll get to that last part in a second. It's not new, but I'd forgotten about it. This bitch is so crazy I can't even keep up with her crazy bitch shit.

Her lawyers concede that that when they searched the "Haven Monahan" account, they were doing so to determine if Jackie had control of any documents discoverable by subpoena.

Ergo, the "Haven Monahan" account hosts documents belonging to "Jackie."

Lawyers for "Jackie," the woman who claimed to Rolling Stone that she had been gang-raped at a University of Virginia fraternity party have finally acknowledged that their client created the fake rapist alleged to have orchestrated the attack.
..........

The lawyers claimed they only accessed the email account to confirm Jackie no longer possessed the documents requested by Dean Nicole Eramo, who is suing Rolling Stone after being negatively portrayed in the article. Eramo was described as being callous and indifferent toward sexual assault accusers, and is now suing for millions of dollars.

Jackie's lawyers had previously sent a letter to Eramo's attorneys — four days after they accessed the email address -- saying "Jackie was not in possession of these emails." This led to the belief that the attorneys had lied and failed to comply with a court order.

Eramo's attorney told the Washington Post that Jackie's lawyers had finally admitted to accessing the fake email address, proving that Jackie created Monahan, "a point they've refused to answer all along."

Lawyers for Jackie had also written in previous court documents that Team Eramo was pursuing "unhinged" efforts to "harass and abuse" Jackie by bringing up Monahan. Jackie's lawyers also still maintain that their client is a sexual abuse victim.

So if you're searching for documents under Jackie's control in an email account under the name "Haven Monahan," this is Jackie's account. QED.

Ashe Schow brings up the other lies this bent idiot made up, one of which I'd forgotten completely about.

The "I just got gang-raped" story wasn't the first story Jackie used to gain sympathy and romantic interest from the boy she had a crush on.

The first attempt was the tale of her terminal illness.
..........

Apparently Jackie's Cancer of the Heart had only one cure -- a hot beef injection from Duffin.

I'll bet she suffers from borderline personality disorder too. Face it, she's just nuts.

Rolling Stone rape hoaxer doesn’t want to answer questions anymore.

From Ashe Schow at the Washington Examiner via H/T at Instapundit:

Liars seldom do, once they've been fouund out.

The woman known as Jackie who shocked the world with her lurid tale of being gang-raped at a University of Virginia fraternity party doesn’t want to answer any more questions as part of a lawsuit.

Filed by U.Va.’s associate dean of students, Nicole Eramo, the lawsuit alleges Rolling Stone Magazine, which published the false rape story, defamed her when it accused her of being cruel to sexual assault accusers. In late January, a judge ordered Jackie to turn over any and all communications between her and Eramo, as well as between her and the author of the article, Sabrina Rubin Erdely, that related to her accusation.

A judge has given Eramo’s attorneys seven hours to depose Jackie, but because of the sheer volume of communications between her and Erdely, and the fact that Eramo would have to share the time with Rolling Stone’s attorneys, the U.Va. dean is asking for another three hours. Naturally, Jackie and her attorney don’t want to talk anymore, and Jackie especially doesn’t want to talk about her rape claims. . . . The same Jackie who told an untrue story to the media now wants the media to leave her alone.

Yeah, well, too bad sister. Nobody needs to deal tenderly with your trauma, since you made the whole thing up. You should be facing jail time.

Absolutely!

If these women would face the same amount of jail time as the falsely accused faced, the number of false accusations would drop to zero!

UVA’s Jackie Will Turn Over Communications, But The Public Won’t See Them

From The Daily Caller:

A federal judge has officially ordered Jackie Coakley, the student at the center of 2014’s infamous gang rape hoax at the University of Virgina, to turn over all of her communications with Rolling Stone.

But unless somebody leaks them, the communications will remain secret from the public.

They will be leaked. It's only a matter of time.

Rolling Stone is currently being sued for $7.5 million by UVA dean Nicole Eramo, who says “A Rape on Campus” defamed her by portraying her as callously handling Coakley’s supposed gang rape. As part of her lawsuit, Eramo has argued that Coakley was a serial liar whom Erdely and Rolling Stone failed to properly vet because they wanted to push her spectacular story. To back up her claims, Eramo has repeatedly sought to have Coakley turn over any communications she made regarding her alleged rape.

Coakley’s lawyers resisted the request, arguing that her communications were protected as an alleged rape victim, blocked by patient-counselor privilege, or were simply irrelevant to a lawsuit against Rolling Stone.

First, Coakley is not and was not a rape victim.

But according to The Daily Progress, U.S. District Judge Glen Conrad said those arguments were without merit. Coakley’s patient-counselor privilege with Eramo was waived when she turned over those communications to Rolling Stone, her protection as an alleged rape victim doesn’t apply to a defamation case, and her communications are highly relevant to the case at hand. As a result, he’s ordered Coakley to produce all of her communications with Eramo, Rolling Stone, Erdely, and UVA concerning her alleged sexual assault. Conrad also ordered Jackie to turn over communications involving “Haven Monahan,” a person Eramo argues was fabricated by Coakley as part of her hoax.

But that doesn’t mean the general public will be able to see how Coakley fooled Rolling Stone anytime soon. Conrad ordered that all of her communications be marked as confidential, meaning it will be illegal to leak them to the public.

It's nice to see that the Judge saw right through the BS thrown up by Coakley's lawyer.

National Organization For Women Defends Rolling Stone Gang Rape Fabricator

From The Daily Caller:

The radical feminist National Organization for Women is defending the former University of Virginia student whose false rape claims against a group of fraternity members appeared in a Rolling Stone article that is now the subject of a massive defamation lawsuit.

In an open letter published this week, NOW president Terry O’Neill called on UVA president Teresa Sullivan to intervene to stop Nicole Eramo, a dean at the school, from pushing forward with her lawsuit against Rolling Stone and its reporter, Sabrina Rubin Erdely, for the Nov. 19, 2014 article “A Rape on Campus.”

Eramo filed a $7.5 million defamation lawsuit against Rolling Stone and Erdely last year. Besides faulting the magazine and the reporter for publishing the article without doing due diligence, Eramo’s attorneys assert in that the UVA student at the center of the piece — a woman named Jackie Coakley — is a “serial liar” who fabricated the assault in order to gain the attention of a man she was in love with.

So, why would the NAGS defend the serial liar?

Could it be that Jackie Coakley would be exposed as complete nut job, in addition to a serial liar?

Would the nationwide exposure of the totally discredited story of Jackie Coakley gut the 1-5 rape statistic?

Would it totally discredit the NAGS?

Face it, it's not about the victims/"survivors", it's about the accumulation of power over men!

UVa Fraternity Falsely Accused of Rape Sues Rolling Stone for $25 Million

From Breitbart's Big Journalism:

The University of Virginia fraternity at the center of a discredited Rolling Stone article that alleged members of the frat house gang-raped a freshman during a party has filed a $25 million defamation lawsuit against the magazine.

In the lawsuit, the Phi Kappa Psi fraternity accused Rolling Stone and writer Sabrina Rubin Erdely of “intentional, reckless and unethical behavior” for publishing the 9,000-word article “A Rape on Campus” in its November 2014 issue. The story alleged members of Phi Kappa Psi violently gang-raped a freshman, identified in the story only as “Jackie,” during a party at the fraternity house in September of 2012.

“Rolling Stone published the article with reckless disregard for the truth,” the lawsuit said.

Two independent investigations by the Columbia School of Journalism and the Charlottesville Police Department later found numerous problems with the magazine’s story, including that no gang rape appeared to have happened at the fraternity on the evening in question. Rolling Stone was forced to retract its story, and managing editor Will Dana resigned as a result of the scandal.

It's about time, I hope the win, big!

We might not learn anything new from Rolling Stone lawsuits

From Ashe Schow at The Washington Examiner via H/T at Instapundit:

Rolling Stone magazine is seeking to limit what gets publicly disclosed during the ongoing defamation case brought forth by University of Virginia Associate Dean Nicole Eramo.

Eramo was the only named official blamed for improperly handling an accusation of a brutal gang rape by a student known as “Jackie.” The accusation was detailed in a now-discredited article that appeared in Rolling Stone. After the story fell apart, Eramo filed a defamation lawsuit against the magazine for its portrayal of her.

The Washington Post’s Erik Wemple noted late last week that even though a Columbia Journalism Review of the article revealed some additional details, there could still be more information out there — information that could be private (such as Jackie’s confidential report of the alleged gang rape). It doesn’t matter that she lied, what she said to Eramo could be protected information.

“The proposal would secure confidentiality for disclosures that fall into any one of several baskets, including information whose release is barred by statute, trade secrets or ‘commercially sensitive’ information, ‘unpublished newsgathering materials’ and ‘information of a personal or intimate nature regarding any individual,’” Wemple wrote.

Wemple, predictably yet amusingly, opposes the protection of “unpublished newsgathering materials.”

The big story here is one of malfeasance by the press. “Unpublished newsgathering materials” are highly relevant to the public’s ability to judge.

Nothing Jackie told the Dean should be privileged, since she lied about it. Since she made the false accusation, all of her statements should be disclosed. Rolling Stone wants to prevent release of the information to protect themselves from the Libel lawsuits by the Frat Members.

BTW, that's what discovery is for.

The Hunt for a Good Bad Guy

From Taki's Magazine via H/T from Instapundit:

There is a severe rape drought going on in the West; not the violent sexual assault as is broadly defined by the law but a particular kind of rape. We want wealthy white males with blond hair high-fiving each other as they torture some poor girl who was just trying to get an education. The Middle East is resplendent with these scenarios, but the guy usually has a funny hat on instead of Richie Rich hair.
..........................


There is a lot of currency behind the Duke lacrosse rapist ideal. Through Title IX, the government offers financial rewards to schools for digging up sexual offenders in varsity jackets. Rapists give feminists something to fight for in a culture where women have little to complain about. This means when a woman lies about frat boys, or carries a mattress around, or simply says someone resembles a rapist, the ax falls hard.
..........................

Which brings me to this week’s rape de semaine. Daryush Valizadeh is a “pickup artist” (a.k.a. PUA) who spares us his ridiculous foreign name by using the moniker Roosh V. He tours the world giving small groups of men simple tips such as: Get in shape, be interesting, start the conversation simple, etc. As far as I’m concerned he’s a hippie love guru trying to rebuild the male-female relationship after decades of sabotage. We live in a stifled environment where groups of men have entirely given up on women and replaced them with porn. They call it a “sexodus” and groups such as MGTOW (Men Going Their Own Way) are “Refusing to bow, serve and kneel for the opportunity to be treated like a disposable utility.” This isn’t good for the human race. As Joe Strummer used to say, “Without people, you’re nothing.”

Encouraging traditional gender roles is a dangerous trend for the rape alarmists. So when Roosh announced he was doing talks in Toronto and Montreal this week, the feminazis committed to shut it down. They cited an article he wrote back in February called “How to Stop Rape” wherein he said we should “make rape legal if done on private property.” His point being women would be a lot less heedless about inviting men over and false accusations would also end if this amendment came to pass. His proposal was about as serious as one of Jonathan Swift’s, but the message is correct. Women have such hubris these days that they are endangering themselves. Getting wasted in public is reckless for a woman no matter how much we “teach men not to rape.” Passing out on a crowded beach may not be asking for it, but it’s pretty close. This is what an intellectual discussion does. It posits an outlandish hypothesis that provokes you into confronting a dark truth. He could have said, “If we forbade black men from ever being around white women, rape cases would plummet.” This is an impossible scenario no sane person would want to implement, but it’s also a great way to showcase the shocking statistics behind interracial rape.

The last thing feminism can tolerate is men REFUSING to bow down.

Cheers to Roosh giving them the flutters and read the whole thing.

Another sad reason to be skeptical of brutal campus sexual assault allegations

From the Ashe Schow at the Washington Examiner:

One of the more damaging and lasting effects of the Rolling Stone gang-rape debacle was that allegations of brutal campus sexual assaults would be less likely to be believed.

The accuser in that story, Jackie, painted a picture of an assault so brutal as to challenge the imagination. She claimed she had been gang-raped on broken glass and punched in the face, and that the experience left her covered in blood and bruises and cuts.

Given her own description, it was difficult to believe that anyone who saw her in such a state would have suggested she not report such a hideous and obvious crime.

A perfect example woman trying to get the attention of another male by claiming to be raped. She's trying to get the target of her affections to be her White Knight.

The same issues plagued Emma Sulkowicz at Columbia University, who claimed that during an otherwise consensual sexual encounter, a man who had never before shown violent tendencies suddenly punched her, choked her and raped her as she fought back. The accused student, Paul Nungesser, invited Sulkowicz to a party two days after this alleged attack — hinting that if the allegations are true, he must be a real sociopath.

I don't know what to make of this woman. My first reaction after learning the fact, she was driven by jealousy for be scorned, since the man she accused was interested in another woman.

My second reaction, after learning about her family and background, she's never been left wanting for anything, i.e. spoiled brat.

Third reaction, attention whore. She liked all the hubbub created by carrying the mattress around.

But then the video. Her "recreation of the "rape." At first, it's just more of being an attention whore. Throw in that her own mother was hyping the video on Youtube, leads me to my final conclusion.

In layman's terms, she's crazy. Just plain crazy.

In both cases, allegedly brutal attacks that would have left obvious injuries were not reported until months later and no witnesses ever confirmed the injuries. Sulkowicz didn't provide a witness at her hearing that confirmed they saw her with bruises around her neck or any facial injury.

Worse still, the accusations suggest that the men involved — fellow university students — fail to grasp the seriousness of punching, choking or otherwise violently injuring a woman in the course of sex as she screams and fights back. How else could they, days later, resume their friendships with those women as if nothing brutal had ever taken place.

Both cases fail the logic test, since they are both fabrications.