Another sad reason to be skeptical of brutal campus sexual assault allegations

From the Ashe Schow at the Washington Examiner:

One of the more damaging and lasting effects of the Rolling Stone gang-rape debacle was that allegations of brutal campus sexual assaults would be less likely to be believed.

The accuser in that story, Jackie, painted a picture of an assault so brutal as to challenge the imagination. She claimed she had been gang-raped on broken glass and punched in the face, and that the experience left her covered in blood and bruises and cuts.

Given her own description, it was difficult to believe that anyone who saw her in such a state would have suggested she not report such a hideous and obvious crime.

A perfect example woman trying to get the attention of another male by claiming to be raped. She's trying to get the target of her affections to be her White Knight.

The same issues plagued Emma Sulkowicz at Columbia University, who claimed that during an otherwise consensual sexual encounter, a man who had never before shown violent tendencies suddenly punched her, choked her and raped her as she fought back. The accused student, Paul Nungesser, invited Sulkowicz to a party two days after this alleged attack — hinting that if the allegations are true, he must be a real sociopath.

I don't know what to make of this woman. My first reaction after learning the fact, she was driven by jealousy for be scorned, since the man she accused was interested in another woman.

My second reaction, after learning about her family and background, she's never been left wanting for anything, i.e. spoiled brat.

Third reaction, attention whore. She liked all the hubbub created by carrying the mattress around.

But then the video. Her "recreation of the "rape." At first, it's just more of being an attention whore. Throw in that her own mother was hyping the video on Youtube, leads me to my final conclusion.

In layman's terms, she's crazy. Just plain crazy.

In both cases, allegedly brutal attacks that would have left obvious injuries were not reported until months later and no witnesses ever confirmed the injuries. Sulkowicz didn't provide a witness at her hearing that confirmed they saw her with bruises around her neck or any facial injury.

Worse still, the accusations suggest that the men involved — fellow university students — fail to grasp the seriousness of punching, choking or otherwise violently injuring a woman in the course of sex as she screams and fights back. How else could they, days later, resume their friendships with those women as if nothing brutal had ever taken place.

Both cases fail the logic test, since they are both fabrications.