There are various ways to interpret Islamic scripture in order to attempt to evolve it out of violence. This, of course, does not change the fact that supremacist, fundamentalist Islam is a legitimate, mainstream, virulently anti-Western interpretation of Islam; but it does at least mean that there can be other mainstream versions of Islam that reject violence and Islam’s politico-legal system.Let than sink in. Liberals/Progressive want American to embrace the influx is muslim into the country and force us to respect their beliefs and customs, but not force them to adapt to our country. If muslims had their way, homosexuals would be killed in the street regularly.
Sharia, on the other hand, is basically set in stone. (Or should I say “stoning”?) Even most Islamic reformers acknowledge that it badly needs reform — not that it can be reinterpreted, but that it needs to be changed. Its provisions and especially its draconian punishments were largely fixed a millennium ago.
The mandate that homosexuals be killed is not from ISIS or al-Qaeda. It is from sharia — which draws on Muslim scripture.
The LBGT community is a pillar of the democratic party, yet they want to have one of the most virulent anti-LBGT communities join their ranks.
WTF?!
No comments:
Post a Comment