You can pin this on Hillary Clinton, John Kerry, Susan Rice, but most of all, the buck stops with the president. Those of us who scoffed a bit at a state senator ascending to the presidency within four years on a wave of media hype and adoration are not quite so shocked by this current mess. We never bought into this notion that getting greater cooperation from our allies, and less hostility from our enemies, was just a matter of giving this crew the wheel and letting them practice, as Hillary Clinton arrogantly declared it, “smart power.” (These people can’t even label a foreign-policy approach without reminding us of how highly they think of themselves.) They looked out at the world at the end of the Bush years, and didn’t see tough decisions, unsolvable problems, unstable institutions, restless populations, technology enabling the impulse to destabilize existing institutions, evil men hungry for more power, and difficult trade-offs. No, our problems and challengers were just a matter of the previous hands running U.S. foreign policy not being smart enough.The Lib and the Drive-By Media have been arguing for years, that America's foreign policy problem are based on decisions made by a Texas cowboy.
So, has the decision being made by the "former constitutional law lecturer/Nobel Prize Laureate" and his Regime proved to be any better? Does the International community have more respect for this country? Do other countries of the world support our country and it's goal? Do Arab countries think more highly of us?
I have said it before and I will say it again. The Dear Leader has never had a real job, never had to produce, and has no experience in the real world. He is the very definition of an Ivory Tower Intellectual , whose response to failure is, "That's not how it worked out in my doctoral thesis."
No comments:
Post a Comment