The Press isn't mad that Ben Rhodes lied to them, They're mad that someone wrote a story about it:They're made because they were exposed as fools and nit-wits, not that they were played for fools.“And now, the echo chamber is mad—but not at Ben Rhodes for what he said. They’re mad at Samuels for getting the story they didn’t—or didn’t even see was there, and they’re mad at him for what he reported. The Washington Post has published three different pieces on Samuels, none favorable, including one by the editor of the book section. The Post is mad of course because the Samuels piece publicly shamed the paper—after all, its main brief is to cover the local industry—the workings of the government of the United States. And yet as the article makes plain, Post reporters and especially columnists got spun and conned about the Iran deal. But much worse than that is that the Post got scooped on the story explaining how gullible they are. Scooped by the New York Times, in their own backyard on the biggest foreign policy story of the past four years! That’s embarrassing.”
A conservative leaning Libertarian stuck in the land of Nuts, Fruits, and Flakes, or as it's affectionately known, by regular people, Kalifornia
Day by Day Cartoon by Chris Muir
Tuesday, May 10, 2016
The Ben Rhodes Blow-up
From The Weekly Standard via H/T at Instapundit:
Labels:
Ben Rhodes,
Clerisy Media
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment